HomeSpending
Filed athletics finances

Who spends the most on men's basketball recruiting

Every figure is read from the school's own NCAA financial report — the annual filing each Division I athletics department submits to the NCAA. Ranked by reported dollars, not by results.
11Schools ranked
FY2016Fiscal year
$1.34MCombined men's basketball recruiting
831Reports parsed

Transportation, lodging, and meals for prospective student-athletes and for staff on official and unofficial visits. These figures are the amounts each school allocated to men's basketball.

Rank / schoolReported men's basketball recruitingChange
01

Texas

$332K · $331,945

no prior year
02

Georgia

$280K · $279,979

no prior year
03

Central Michigan

$151K · $150,870

no prior year
04

Texas State

$101K · $100,755

no prior year
05

Akron

$88K · $87,926

no prior year
06

Marshall

$79K · $79,195

no prior year
07

UMBC

$73K · $73,449

no prior year
08

Southeast Missouri State University

$70K · $70,193

no prior year
09

App State

$64K · $64,338

no prior year
10

Georgia State

$55K · $55,437

no prior year
11

Georgia Southern

$42K · $41,889

no prior year
How to read these rankings

These figures come from filed NCAA financial reports collected in our document corpus and parsed from the report text. 831 reports parsed cleanly; 56 could not be read and are absent from these rankings, so a school missing from a year has not necessarily reported nothing.

Football and basketball views come from the report's per-sport allocation tables. They cover recruiting and team travel, not aviation alone: commercial airfare, buses, hotels, meals, and other eligible costs share the same lines. A school can also leave some expenses unallocated.

Private universities have no public-disclosure obligation and generally do not appear. Fiscal years are not uniform — most close June 30, but some schools close on a different date, so a single “FY” column compares slightly different periods. Schools also categorize inconsistently between reports, so treat cross-school gaps of a few percent as noise rather than signal.