HomeSpending
Filed athletics finances

Who spends the most on football recruiting

Every figure is read from the school's own NCAA financial report — the annual filing each Division I athletics department submits to the NCAA. Ranked by reported dollars, not by results.
14Schools ranked
FY2018Fiscal year
$8.72MCombined football recruiting
831Reports parsed

Transportation, lodging, and meals for prospective student-athletes and for staff on official and unofficial visits. These figures are the amounts each school allocated to football.

Rank / schoolReported football recruitingChange
01

Georgia

$2.63M · $2,626,622

+16% YoY
02

Texas

$1.82M · $1,823,307

+115% YoY
03

Oklahoma

$1.26M · $1,264,809

+14% YoY
04

Missouri

$686K · $685,834

+6% YoY
05

Boise State

$414K · $414,229

+26% YoY
06

Texas State

$295K · $294,642

+49% YoY
07

App State

$270K · $270,308

−16% YoY
08

Buffalo

$270K · $269,552

−7% YoY
09

Western Michigan

$249K · $249,215

−16% YoY
10

Central Michigan

$201K · $200,537

+12% YoY
11

Georgia State

$187K · $187,257

flat
12

Arkansas State

$171K · $171,265

−32% YoY
13

Ball State

$152K · $151,607

no prior year
14

Georgia Southern

$114K · $113,511

+19% YoY
How to read these rankings

These figures come from filed NCAA financial reports collected in our document corpus and parsed from the report text. 831 reports parsed cleanly; 56 could not be read and are absent from these rankings, so a school missing from a year has not necessarily reported nothing.

Football and basketball views come from the report's per-sport allocation tables. They cover recruiting and team travel, not aviation alone: commercial airfare, buses, hotels, meals, and other eligible costs share the same lines. A school can also leave some expenses unallocated.

Private universities have no public-disclosure obligation and generally do not appear. Fiscal years are not uniform — most close June 30, but some schools close on a different date, so a single “FY” column compares slightly different periods. Schools also categorize inconsistently between reports, so treat cross-school gaps of a few percent as noise rather than signal.