HomeSpending
Filed athletics finances

Who spends the most on football team travel

Every figure is read from the school's own NCAA financial report — the annual filing each Division I athletics department submits to the NCAA. Ranked by reported dollars, not by results.
13Schools ranked
FY2018Fiscal year
$14.55MCombined football team travel
831Reports parsed

Air and ground transportation, lodging, and meals for competition — the line charter flights are paid from. These figures are the amounts each school allocated to football.

Rank / schoolReported football team travelChange
01

Georgia

$2.10M · $2,101,268

−6% YoY
02

Texas

$1.98M · $1,984,853

+53% YoY
03

Oklahoma

$1.74M · $1,737,669

+15% YoY
04

Missouri

$1.56M · $1,558,399

+11% YoY
05

Buffalo

$966K · $966,489

+4% YoY
06

Arkansas State

$942K · $942,437

+11% YoY
07

Boise State

$899K · $898,892

+11% YoY
08

Texas State

$878K · $877,522

+9% YoY
09

Central Michigan

$783K · $783,137

+28% YoY
10

App State

$763K · $762,855

−5% YoY
11

Western Michigan

$710K · $710,065

+89% YoY
12

Georgia State

$642K · $641,752

−6% YoY
13

Georgia Southern

$582K · $582,167

−17% YoY
How to read these rankings

These figures come from filed NCAA financial reports collected in our document corpus and parsed from the report text. 831 reports parsed cleanly; 56 could not be read and are absent from these rankings, so a school missing from a year has not necessarily reported nothing.

Football and basketball views come from the report's per-sport allocation tables. They cover recruiting and team travel, not aviation alone: commercial airfare, buses, hotels, meals, and other eligible costs share the same lines. A school can also leave some expenses unallocated.

Private universities have no public-disclosure obligation and generally do not appear. Fiscal years are not uniform — most close June 30, but some schools close on a different date, so a single “FY” column compares slightly different periods. Schools also categorize inconsistently between reports, so treat cross-school gaps of a few percent as noise rather than signal.